Diogo Portela

2016 matches and statistics
OoM ranking: 131


 

15 matches

Cells in green are better than opponent, grey is equal. H-R win = win vs higher ranked player. H-R loss = loss vs higher ranked player.

date tournament round opponent result score average opponent checkout high h-r win h-r loss 180s
2019-08-04 PDPA Players... Last 128 Matt Clark Lost 3-6 N Y
2019-08-03 PDPA Players... Last 32 Darius Labanaus... Lost 2-6 N Y
2019-08-03 PDPA Players... Last 64 Chris Dobey Won 6-5 Y
2019-08-03 PDPA Players... Last 128 Patrick van den... Won 6-3 N
2019-05-03 PDC Austrian... Last 48 Ryan Searle Lost 1-6 78.11 88.14 20.00% 40 N Y 1
2019-04-20 PDC German D... Last 48 Karel Sedlacek Lost 4-6 85.37 92.18 50.00% 66 N Y 1
2019-04-07 PDPA Players... Last 128 Luke Humphries Lost 3-6 N Y
2019-03-29 PDC German D... Last 48 Mervyn King Lost 4-6 82.96 88.12 23.53% 80 N Y 2
2019-03-01 UK Open Last 128 Jamie Hughes Lost 1-6 101.03 107.72 20.00% 33 N Y 3
2019-03-01 UK Open Last 160 Barrie Bates Won 6-4 Y
2019-02-10 PDPA Players... Last 128 Peter Wright Lost 3-6 N Y
2019-02-09 PDPA Players... Last 16 Harry Ward Lost 3-6 N
2019-02-09 PDPA Players... Last 32 Josh Payne Won 6-3 Y
2019-02-09 PDPA Players... Last 64 Gerwyn Price Won 6-5 Y
2019-02-09 PDPA Players... Last 128 Ronny Huybrecht... Won 6-3 Y

Aggregated

Tournaments: 9
Results: L9 W6
Average: 86.87
Checkout: 28.38%
180s: 7
180s per match: 1.75
180s per leg: 0.21
180s per leg opponents: 0.18
Average opponent: 94.04
Avg. legs won per match: 4
Avg. legs lost per match: 5.13
Total legs played: 137
Win vs higher ranked players 5 - 83.33%
Lost vs higher ranked players 8 - 88.89%
Average total legs per match: 9.13

Match statistics

Highest average: 0%
Highest checkout: 0%
Most scores of 180: 75%
Full sweeps (win, checkout & 180s): 0%
Matches with even leg total: 26.67%
Matches with odd leg total: 73.33%
Score of 180 in leg 1: 60%
Score of 180 in leg 2: 0%
Score of 180 in leg 3: 0%
Note that we do not collect all statistics for all matches, and that we reserve no right to the accuracy of the stats. Feedback? Tweet us!